Tag: does>

In which we have to reimplement create and does>. Having implemented create and does> as described previously, there are two problems. Consider the following extract from my core tests: t(": DOES1 DOES> @ 1 + ;", expected: "") t(": DOES2 DOES> @ 2 + ;", expected: "") t("CREATE CR1", expected: "") t("CR1 here =", expected: … Continue reading Forth does create

In which my head explodes. create and does> are what is currently causing the unit tests of my Forth interpreter to fail. So what do these things do? Well, if you read the Forth specification, it becomes obvious that the main thing they do is make a nice smoothy out of your brain. Fortunately, I … Continue reading Does Forth create